ShopMobileRadio RSSRivals.com Yahoo! Sports


AA Football Board
Register User Options
Site: Forum:


Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply   Page 1

Previous Topic | Next Topic | Back to Topics
JB, every time I hear you talk about the 1A playoffs on the radio you make it seem like it is done the same way as the 4A playoffs in that teams become eligible and then are split up into the two divisions. In 1A, it is already predetermined who is in division I and who is in division II. For example, Williston-Elko is definitely in division II. Also, even though Blackville-Hilda and Williston-Elko are in the same region, Blackville will be in the lower state for the playoffs.

HKT is also better than you are giving them credit for. They will upset someone in the playoffs.

Posted on 10/5 9:29 AM | IP: Logged

I think the only thing I say about 1A playoffs is that it is split into two divisions, which is something I don't agree with (for any of the classes). I know they are predetermined. I still say we should just have four classifications for the playoffs.

As for the 1A brackets, I think they should look at doing cross bracketing to ensure a shot at the best possible match up for the finals. I know it would require some kind of points system, but I think we'd bet a better product on the field.

As for HKT, I think they proved this week(in the second half) they are a dangerous team. I don't think they will go deep, but I do think they could certainly be a spoiler for someone.



Posted on 10/5 7:13 PM | IP: Logged

i'm in favor or 5 classifications with one champion each. darn this split division crap!



Posted on 10/5 9:58 PM | IP: Logged

I don't like the split in 1-A.But it do give the big 1-A school a chance to win a state champion,because most of them was a nobody in 2-A football.Bamberg,Calhoun-County,Allendale-Fairfax was finishing 3or 4 in their region.JB i disagree on that H-K-T NOT GOING DEEP IN THE PLAYOFF,I THINK H-K-T WILL BE THE CINDERALLA THIS YEAR.



Posted on 10/5 10:28 PM | IP: Logged

Jlove, I think you erred in your take on classifications just like you, in error, thought HKT was going to beat Williston... It is all about the school enrollment numbers in classifications and divisions. Is it fair for HKT with about 200 kids to have to compete in the same playoffs as Chesterfield that is pushing 600 kids???? I agree it makes for some watered down games in the first rounds of the playoffs but you are talking about a huge disparity in enrollments. Same thing with Bamberg, Calhoun, and Allendale when they were the smallest schools in 2A, they were playing schools like Silver Bluff with twice the enrollments meaning twice the size talent pool to draw from! And I know BE, CC, and AF did compete... maybe not a consistently as now, and BE won a State Championship in '90!

This post was edited on 10/6 1:36 PM by elcid912001



Posted on 10/6 7:42 AM | IP: Logged

I think it would interesting to see the breakdown of what classifications teams would be in "if" we had 5 classifications.



Posted on 10/6 9:06 AM | IP: Logged

Elcid just because i said H-K-T was going to be W-E, Don't mean i don't know what i'm talking about.i do know the enrollment decide what classification.3 years ago H-K-T was in D-I,because we use 2 player from Branchville,they didn't have football program at the time.As for you Elcid you haven't predict your'll high school to win and they lose, do that mean you don't know what you talking about.chesterfield has 477 students compare to H-K-T 344.Get your number right before you say somebody don't know what they talking about.Fair, ask Blackville-Hilda if it fair when they beat Calhoun county in the state 2005.You haven't seen H-K-T play and passing judgement by what happen in the pass.who is your school?



Posted on 10/6 9:13 AM | IP: Logged

He pulls for Chesterfield...so no...HKT can't beat them either. Also, will you talk about this weeks game against Blackville and what you think HKT will do to try to pull off the upset?



Posted on 10/6 10:33 AM | IP: Logged

You are off again... At the end of school year 08/09, HKT had 198 students to Chesterfield's 569 students in their 135 ADM numbers used to set up the new classifications!!!!

This is all the schools in 1A and their ranking in student # in accordance with a post on Rivals...
145 Burke 577
146 Blacksburg 577
147 Ridgeland 573
148 Chesterfield 569
149 Abbeville 554
150 North Central 544
151 Landrum 496
152 Carvers Bay 483
153 Calhoun County 474
154 Ninety-Six 472
155 Bamberg-Ehrhardt 461
156 Latta 457
157 C. A. Johnson 456
158 Hemingway 441
159 Allendale-Fairfax 433
160 Johnsonville 427
161 Greenville Tech Charter 420
162 Lewisville 418
163 Baptist Hill 400
164 East Clarendon 400
165 Estill 396
166 St. John's 377
167 Hannah-Pamplico 372
168 Green Sea-Floyds 365
169 Ware Shoals 359
170 Wagener-Salley 337
171 C. E. Murray 329
172 McBee 322
173 Lamar 317
174 Dixie 314
175 Williston-Elko 313
176 Southside Christian 312
177 Great Falls 310
178 Scott's Branch 309
179 Fox Creek 306
180 Hardeeville 306
181 Christ Church 299
182 Ridge Spring-Monetta 286
183 Brashier Middle College Charter 277
184 Timmonsville 275
185 Denmark-Olar 270
186 Lake View 268
187 Cross 262
188 Military Magnet 259
189 McCormick 257
190 Blackville-Hilda 248
191 Bethune-Bowman 230
192 Creek Bridge 224
193 Hunter-Kinard-Tyler 198
194 Branchville 191
195 North 180
196 Tamassee-Salem 176
197 Lincoln 152
198 Whale Branch 150
199 Whitmire 144
200 Calhoun Falls 134
201 Governor’s School Arts 100
202 Governor’s School Math 100
203 SCSDB 70
204 Charleston Math & Science Charter 56

and my team is 6 and 0!!!
3dGrin3dGrin

This post was edited on 10/6 2:01 PM by elcid912001



Posted on 10/6 1:54 PM | IP: Logged

I agree that there needs to be a 5 class system. 1A keeps getting dumped on as more and more of these new schools open up. The unfair student enrollment advantage that a bunch of these 2A-lite schools have is going to eventually trickle down to other sports besides football. Just look at the past few years in baseball-the better teams, besides Lake View, have been Landrum, Chesterfield, Bamberg, Johnsonville-schools with large numbers.

Posted on 10/7 7:23 PM | IP: Logged

A resource of Public and Private U.S high schools data

Home | Search | About Us | Contact Us

View Schools by State:
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming


You are here: Home > South Carolina > Neeses > Hunter-kinard-tyler High School

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School
Below you will find detailed information about Hunter-kinard-tyler High School located in Neeses, South Carolina.

School Contact Info:
Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Address:
7066 Norway
Neeses, SC 29107

Website:
None

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School County:
Orangeburg

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Phone Number:
803-263-4832

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School District:
Orangeburg County School District 04
School Statistics:
Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Enrollment:
Total Enrollment - 330
Rank Nationally - 11155 out of 19379
Rank in South Carolina - 181 out of 244

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Students by Grade:
9th - 58
10th - 48
11th - 55
12th - 40

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Students by Gender:
Male - 166 (50%)
Female - 164 (50%)

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Students by Ethnicity:
American Indian - 0 (0%)
Asian - 0 (0%)
Black - 266 (81%)
Hispanic - 0 (0%)
White - 64 (19%)


Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Student to Teacher Statistics:
Pupil/Teacher Ratio: 9.8
Student/Teacher Rank in SC: 8 of 244
Full Time Teachers: 33.6
Rank in South Carolina: 158 of 244

Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Students by Lunch Assistance:
Free Lunch Eligible - 240 (73%)
Reduced-Price Lunch Eligible - 33 (10%)
Combined Free or Reduced - 273 (83%)
Rank in South Carolina: 145 of 244

School on a map
Terms of UseMapSatelliteHybrid

Search for former Hunter-kinard-tyler High School Students
Grad Year 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1916 1915 1914 1913 1912 1911 1910
First Name Last Name Graduation year


Hunter-kinard-tyler High School News
No news was found to report for Hunter-kinard-tyler High School



Home | Search | About Us | Contact Us

Data on U.S. Public High Schools & Private High Schools
Data provided by the National Center for Education Statistics
Copyright 2009. High-Schools.com All Rights Reserved.



Posted on 10/7 8:49 PM | IP: Logged

But the SCHSL does not use the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics to set up their classifications but the numbers from the 135 day enrollments which is what I posted.


And the two division systems in 4A and 1A is the only way to address the huge disparity in enrollments at the upper end and lower ends of the classes.

Yogi, BH and WE do not have problems competing in football with the larger 1A teams why in baseball??? It has to do with commitment to the program and not numbers at this level. Calhoun County is a prime example, they dominate in Basketball, are regular contenders in football, but can't compete in baseball!

This post was edited on 10/8 8:21 AM by elcid912001

I don't have a dog in this fight my kids go to private school but th same applies.

This post was edited on 1/10 3:12 PM by elcid912001

10/8 7:28 AM | IP: Logged Why not have a true 6-A division instead of 2 @ 1A and 2@ 4A.



Posted on 10/8 8:26 PM | IP: Logged

jlove that data is old. There are less than 200 kids at HKT in the high school (9-12) this year. That data most likely is including the middle school (another 94 or so kids) as well. However, the data is still old. It says there are 33.6 teachers. There are only 25.5 of us this year. (Gotta love the economy.)

About the brackets though... I guess I understand that it makes a difference because the size of the talent pool is smaller but all the schools have the have the same number of kids on the field. It just so happens that our team makes up a much larger percentage of the entire student body.

I am not claiming to understand the bracket thing at all, so my question is; is it only based on school population size? There aren't any other contributing factors?



Posted on 11/10 10:49 PM | IP: Logged

Previous Topic | Next Topic | Back to Topics

Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply Page 1

LATEST NEWS




Rivals.com is your source for: College Football | Football Recruiting | College Basketball | Basketball Recruiting | College Baseball | High School | College Merchandise
Site-specific editorial/photos © SCVarsity.com. All rights reserved. This website is an officially and independently operated source of news and information not affiliated with any school or team.
About | Advertise with Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | About our Ads | Terms of Service | Copyright/IP policy | Yahoo! Sports - NBC Sports Network

Statistical information ©2007 STATS LLC All Rights Reserved.